再论医疗事故争议纠纷的诉讼管辖

再论医疗事故争议纠纷的

诉讼管辖

【摘要】本文从正反两方面论述了医疗纠纷中以“侵权结果发生地”确定管辖权的合理性及必要性。并从司法实践出发，

就如何从证据法学角度认定“结果发生地”的相关事实阐述了作者的观点。

【关键词】医疗纠纷；管辖；侵权结果发生地；程序法事实；较高程度的盖然性

【中图分类号】d923

【文献标识码】b ‘

【文章编号】1007—9297(20XX)01—0027—04

revisit of the jurisdiction over medical litigation．song．l删school,nanjing city sanjiang college，nanjing,china

【abstract】both of the advantages and disadvantages of claiming jufisdiction over medical disputes according to

the place

where the result of tort has taken place are discussed in terms of rationality and necessity．moreover，some opinions about how to

confirm the place where the result of tort has actually taken place are given from the perspective of evidence law．

【key words】medical dispute，jurisdiction，the place where the result of tort take place，procedural facts，proof on a balance

of probabilities

在《法律与医学杂志》20XX年第lo卷(第4期)

上，笔者认真地阅读了沈成良先生撰写的《医疗事故

争议纠纷的诉讼管辖》(以下简称“原文”)一文，“原 文”通过一个具体案例的分析，阐述了作者的核心观 点——医疗事故纠纷不应以“侵权结果发生地”确立

管辖权。对此观点，笔者难以苟同。考虑到管辖问题在

医疗纠纷中的重大实际意义以及《法律与医学杂志》 在医学、法律界深远的影响力，笔者深感有必要再