专利法实施细则(英文版)Implementing Regulations

Implementing Regulations of the Patent

Law of the People's Republic of China

(Promulgated by Decree No. 306 of the State Council of the People's Republic of China on June 15, 2001, and effective as of July 1, 2001)

(Translated by the Patent Admi nistration Department under the State Council of the People’s Republic of China. In case of discrepancy, the original version shall prevail.)

Chapter I General Provisions

Rule 1. These Implementing Regulations are formulated in accordance with the Patent Law of the People's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the Patent Law).

Rule 2 "Invention" in the Patent Law means any new technical solution relating to a product, a process or improvement thereof.

"Utility model" in the Patent Law means any new technical solution relating to the shape, the structure, or their combination, of a product, which is fit for practical use.

"Design" in the Patent Law means any new design of the shape, the pattern or their combination, or the combination of the color with shape or pattern, of a product, which creates an aesthetic feeling and is fit for industrial application.

Rule 3 Any formalities prescribed by the Patent Law and these Implementing Regulations shall be complied with in a written form or in any other form prescribed by the Patent Administration Department under the State Council .

Rule 4 Any document submitted in accordance with the provisions of the Patent Law and these Implementing Regulations shall be in Chinese; the standard scientific and technical terms shall be used if there is a prescribed one set forth by the State; where no generally accepted translation in Chinese can be found for a foreign name or scientific or technical term, the one in the original language shall be also indicated.

Where any certificate or certifying document submitted in accordance with the provisions of the Patent Law and these Implementing Regulations is in a foreign language, the Patent Administration Department under the State Council may, when it deems necessary, request a Chinese translation of the certificate or the certifying document be submitted within a specified time limit; where the translation is not submitted within the specified time limit, the certificate or certifying document shall be deemed not to have been submitted.

Rule 5 Where any document is sent by mail to the Patent Administration Department under the State Council , the date of mailing indicated by the postmark on the envelope shall be deemed to be the date of filing; where the date of mailing indicated by the postmark on the envelope is illegible, the date on which the Patent Administration Department under the State Council receives the document shall be the date of filing, except where the date of mailing is proved by the party concerned.

Any document of the Patent Administration Department under the State Council may be served by mail, by personal delivery or by other forms. Where any party concerned appoints a patent agency, the document shall be sent to the patent agency; where no patent agency is appointed, the document shall be sent to the liaison person named in the request.

Where any document is sent by mail by the Patent Administration Department under the State Council , the 16th day from the date of mailing shall be presumed to be the date on which the party concerned receives the document.

Where any document is delivered personally in accordance with the provisions of the Patent Administration Department under the State Council , the date of delivery is the date on which the party concerned receives the document.

Where the address of any document is not clear and it cannot be sent by mail, the document may be served by making an announcement. At the expiration of one month from the date of the announcement, the document shall be deemed to be served.

Rule 6 The first day of any time limit prescribed in the Patent Law and these Implementing Regulations shall not be counted in the time limit. Where the time limit is counted by year or by month, it shall expire on the corresponding day of the last month; if there is no corresponding day in that month, the time limit shall expire on the last day of that month; if a time limit expires on an official holiday, it shall expire on the first working day following that official holiday.

Rule 7 Where a time limit prescribed in the Patent Law or these Implementing Regulations or specified by the Patent Administration Department under the State Council is not observed by a party concerned because of force majeure, resulting in loss of his or its rights, he or it may, within two months from the date on which the impediment is removed, at the latest within two years immediately following the expiration of that time limit, state the reasons, together with relevant supporting documents, and request the Patent Administration Department under the State Council to restore his or its rights.

Where a time limit prescribed in the Patent Law or these Implementing Regulations or specified by the Patent Administration Department under the State Council is not observed by a party concerned because of any justified reason, resulting in loss of his or its rights, he or it may, within two months from the date of receipt of a notification from the Patent Administration Department under the State Council , state the reasons and request the Patent Administration Department under the State Council to restore his or its rights.

Where the party concerned makes a request for an extension of a time limit specified by the Patent Administration Department under the State Council , he or it shall, before the time limit expires, state the reasons to the Patent Administration Department under the State Council and go through the relevant formalities.

The provisions of paragraphs one and two of this Rule shall not be applicable to the time limit referred to in Articles 24, 29, 42 and 62 of the Patent Law.

Rule 8 Where an application for a patent for invention relates to the secrets of the State concerning national defense and requires to be kept secret, the application for patent shall be filed with the patent department of national defense. Where any application for patent for invention relating to the secrets of the State concerning national defense and requiring to be kept secret is received by the Patent Administration Department under the State Council , the application shall be forwarded to the patent department of national defense for examination, and the Patent Administration Department under the State Council shall make a decision on the basis of the observations of the examination made by the patent department of national defense.

Subject to the preceding paragraph, the Patent Administration Department under the State Council shall, after receipt of an application for patent for invention which is required to be examined for the purpose of security, send it to the relevant competent department under the State Council for examination. The relevant competent department shall, within four months from the date of receipt of the application, notify the Patent Administration Department under the State Council of the results of the examination. Where the invention for which a patent is applied for is required to be kept secret, the Patent Administration Department under the State Council shall handle it as an application for secret patent and notify the applicant accordingly.

Rule 9 Any invention-creation that is contrary to the laws of the State referred to in Article 5 of the Patent Law shall not include the invention-creation merely because the exploitation of which is prohibited by the laws of the State.

Rule 10 The date of filing referred to in the Patent Law, except for those referred to in Articles 28 and 42, means the priority date where priority is claimed.

The date of filing referred to in these Implementing Regulations, except as otherwise prescribed, means the date of filing prescribed in Article 28 of the Patent Law.

Rule l1 "A service invention-creation made by a person in execution of the tasks of the entity to which he belongs" referred to in Article 6 of the Patent Law means any invention-creation made:

(1) in the course of performing his own duty;

(2) in execution of any task, other than his own duty, which was entrusted to him by the entity to which he belongs;

(3) within one year from his resignation, retirement or change of work, where the invention-creation relates to his own duty or the other task entrusted to him by the entity to which he previously belonged.

"The entity to which he belongs" referred to in Article 6 of the Patent Law includes the entity in

which the person concerned is a temporary staff member. “Material and technic al means of the entity” referred to in Article 6 of the Patent Law mean the entity's money, equipment, spare parts, raw materials or technical materials which are not disclosed to the public.

Rule 12 "Inventor" or "creator" referred to in the Patent Law means any person who makes creative contributions to the substantive features of an invention-creation. Any person who, during the course of accomplishing the invention-creation, is responsible only for organizational work, or who offers facilities for making use of material and technical means, or who takes part in other auxiliary functions, shall not be considered as inventor or creator.

Rule l3 For any identical invention-creation, only one patent right shall be granted.

Two or more applicants who respectively file, on the same day, applications for patent for the identical invention-creation, as provided for in Article 9 of the Patent Law, shall, after receipt of a notification from the Patent Administration Department under the State Council , hold consultations among themselves to decide the person or persons who shall be entitled to file the application.

Rule 14 Any assignment of the right to apply for a patent or of the patent right, by a Chinese entity or individual, to a foreigner shall be approved by the competent department for foreign trade and economic affairs of the State Council in conjunction with the science and technology administration department of the State Council.

Rule 15 Except for the assignment of the patent right in accordance with Article 10 of the Patent Law, where the patent right is transferred because of any other reason, the person or persons concerned shall, accompanied by relevant certified documents or legal papers, request the Patent Administration Department under the State Council to make a registration of change in the owner of the patent right.

Any license contract for exploitation of the patent which has been concluded by the patentee with an entity or individual shall, within three months from the date of entry into force of the contract, be submitted to the Patent Administration Department under the State Council for the record.

Chapter II Application for Patent

Rule l6 Anyone who applies for a patent in written form shall file with the Patent Administration Department under the State Council application documents in two copies.

Anyone who applies for a patent in other forms as provided by the Patent Administration Department under the State Council shall comply with the relevant provisions.

Any applicant who appoints a patent agency for applying for a patent, or for having other patent matters to attend to before the Patent Administration Department under the State Council , shall submit at the same time a power of attorney indicating the scope of the power entrusted.

Where there are two or more applicants and no patent agency is appointed, unless otherwise stated in the request, the applicant named first in the request shall be the representative.

Rule l7 "Other related matters" in the request referred to in Article 26, paragraph two of the Patent Law means:

(1) the nationality of the applicant;

(2) where the applicant is an enterprise or other organization, the name of the country in which the applicant has the principal business office;

(3) where the applicant has appointed a patent agency, the relevant matters which shall be indicated; where no patent agency is appointed, the name, address, postcode and telephone number of the liaison person;

(4) where the priority of an earlier application is claimed, the relevant matters which shall be indicated;

(5) the signature or seal of the applicant or the patent agency;

(6) a list of the documents constituting the application;

(7) a list of the documents appending the application; and

(8) any other related matter which needs to be indicated.

Rule l8 The description of an application for a patent for invention or utility model shall state the title of the invention or utility model, which shall be the same as it appears in the request. The description shall include the following:

(1) technical field: specifying the technical field to which the technical solution for which protection is sought pertains;

(2) background art: indicating the background art which can be regarded as useful for the understanding, searching and examination of the invention or utility model, and when possible, citing the documents reflecting such art;

(3) contents of the invention: disclosing the technical problem the invention or utility model aims to settle and the technical solution adopted to resolve the problem; and stating, with reference to the prior art, the advantageous effects of the invention or utility model;

(4) description of figures: briefly describing each figure in the drawings, if any;

(5) mode of carrying out the invention or utility model: describing in detail the optimally selected mode contemplated by the applicant for carrying out the invention or utility model; where appropriate, this shall be done in terms of examples, and with reference to the drawings, if any;

The manner and order referred to in the preceding paragraph shall be followed by the applicant for a patent for invention or for utility model, and each of the parts shall be preceded by a heading, unless, because of the nature of the invention or utility model, a different manner or order would result in a better understanding and a more economical presentation.

The description of the invention or utility model shall use standard terms and be in clear wording, and shall not contain such referen ces to the claims as: "as described in claim …", nor shall it contain commercial advertising.

Where an application for a patent for invention contains disclosure of one or more nucleotide and/or amino acid sequences, the description shall contain a sequence listing in compliance with the standard prescribed by the Patent Administration Department under the State Council . The sequence listing shall be submitted as a separate part of the description, and a copy of the said sequence listing in machine-readable form shall also be submitted in accordance with the provisions of the Patent Administration Department under the State Council .

Rule l9 The same sheet of drawings may contain several figures of the invention or utility model, and the figures shall be numbered and arranged in numerical order consecutively as "Figure l, Figure 2, …".

The scale and the distinctness of the drawings shall be as such that a reproduction with a linear reduction in size to two-thirds would still enable all details to be clearly distinguished.

Reference signs not mentioned in the text of the description of the invention or utility model shall not appear in the drawings. Reference signs not mentioned in the drawings shall not appear in the text of the description. Reference signs for the same composite part shall be used consistently throughout the application document.

The drawings shall not contain any other explanatory notes, except words which are indispensable.

Rule 20 The claims shall define clearly and concisely the matter for which protection is sought in terms of the technical features of the invention or utility model.

If there are several claims, they shall be numbered consecutively in Arabic numerals.

The technical terminology used in the claims shall be consistent with that used in the description. The claims may contain chemical or mathematical formulae but no drawings. They shall not, except where absolutely necessary, contain such references to the description or drawings as: "as described in part …of the description", or "as illustrated in Figure …of the drawings".

The technical features mentioned in the claims may, in order to facilitate quicker understanding of the claim, make reference to the corresponding reference signs in the drawings of the description. Such reference signs shall follow the corresponding technical features and be placed in parentheses. They shall not be construed as limiting the claims.

Rule 2l The claims shall have an independent claim, and may also contain dependent claims.

The independent claim shall outline the technical solution of an invention or utility model and state the essential technical features necessary for the solution of its technical problem.

The dependent claim shall, by additional technical features, further define the claim which it refers to.

Rule 22 An independent claim of an invention or utility model shall contain a preamble portion and a characterizing portion, and be presented in the following form:

(1) a preamble portion: indicating the title of the claimed subject matter of the technical solution of the invention or utility model, and those technical features which are necessary for the definition of the claimed subject matter but which, in combination, are part of the most related prior art;

(2) a charac terizing portion: stating, in such words as "characterized in that… ”or in similar expressions, the technical features of the invention or utility model, which distinguish it from the most related prior art. Those features, in combination with the features stated in the preamble portion, serve to define the scope of protection of the invention or utility model.

Where the manner specified in the preceding paragraphs is not appropriate to be followed because of the nature of the invention or utility model, an independent claim may be presented in a different manner.

An invention or utility model shall have only one independent claim, which shall precede all the dependent claims relating to the same invention or utility model.

Rule 23 Any dependent claim of an invention or utility model shall contain a reference portion and a characterizing portion, and be presented in the following manner:

(l) a reference portion: indicating the serial number(s) of the claim(s) referred to, and the title of

the subject matter;

(2) a characterizing portion: stating the additional technical features of the invention or utility model.

Any dependent claim shall only refer to the preceding claim or claims. Any multiple dependent claims, which refers to two or more claims, shall refer to the preceding one in the alternative only, and shall not serve as a basis for any other multiple dependent claims.

Rule 24 The abstract shall consist of a summary of the disclosure as contained in the application for patent for invention or utility model. The summary shall indicate the title of the invention or utility model, and the technical field to which the invention or utility model pertains, and shall be drafted in a way which allows the clear understanding of the technical problem, the gist of the technical solution of that problem, and the principal use or uses of the invention or utility model.

The abstract may contain the chemical formula which best characterizes the invention. In an application for a patent which contains drawings, the applicant shall provide a figure which best characterizes the technical features of the invention or utility model. The scale and the distinctness of the figure shall be as such that a reproduction with a linear reduction in size to 4cm x 6cm would still enable all details to be clearly distinguished. The whole text of the abstract shall contain not more than 300 words. There shall be no commercial advertising in the abstract.

Rule 25 Where an invention for which a patent is applied for concerns a new biological material which is not available to the public and which cannot be described in the application in such a manner as to enable the invention to be carried out by a person skilled in the art, the applicant shall, in addition to the other requirements provided for in the Patent Law and these Implementing Regulations, go through the following formalities:

(1) depositing a sample of the biological material with a depositary institution designated by the Patent Administration Department under the State Council before, or at the latest, on the date of filing (or the priority date where priority is claimed), and submit at the time of filing or at the latest, within four months from the filing date, a receipt of deposit and the viability proof from the depository institution; where they are not submitted within the specified time limit, the sample of the biological material shall be deemed not to have been deposited;

(2) giving in the application document relevant information of the characteristics of the biological material;

(3) indicating, where the application relates to the deposit of the biological material, in the request and the description the scientific name (with its Latin name) and the title and address of the depositary institution, the date on which the sample of the biological material was deposited and the accession number of the deposit; where, at the time of filing, they are not indicated, they shall be supplied within four months from the date of filing; where after the expiration of the time limit they are not supplied, the sample of the biological material shall be deemed not to have been

deposited.

Rule 26 Where the applicant for a patent for invention has deposited a sample of the biological material in accordance with the provisions of Rule 25 of these Implementing Regulations, and after the application for patent for invention is published, any entity or individual that intends to make use of the biological material to which the application relates, for the purpose of experiment, shall make a request to the Patent Administration Department under the State Council , containing the following items:

(1) the name and address of the requesting person;

(2) an undertaking not to make the biological material available to any other person;

(3) an undertaking to use the biological material for experimental purpose only before the grant of the patent right.

Rule 27 The size of drawings or photographs of a design submitted in accordance with the provisions of Article 27 of the Patent Law shall not be smaller than 3cm × 8cm, nor larger than l5cm × 22cm.

Where an application for a patent for design seeking concurrent protection of colors is filed, a drawing or photograph in color shall be submitted in two copies.

The applicant shall, in respect of the subject matter of the product incorporating the design which is in need of protection, submit the relevant views and stereoscopic drawings or photographs, so as to clearly show the subject matter for which protection is sought.

Rule 28 Where an application for a patent for design is filed, a brief explanation of the design shall, when necessary, be made.

The brief explanation of the design shall include the essential portion of the design, the colors for which protection is sought and the omission of the view of the product incorporating the design. The brief explanation shall not contain any commercial advertising and shall not be used to indicate the function of the product.

Rule 29 Where the Patent Administration Department under the State Council deems necessary, it may require the applicant for a patent for design to submit a sample or model of the product incorporating the design. The volume of the sample or model submitted shall not exceed 30cm ×30cm × 30cm, and its weight shall not surpass l5 kilograms. Articles that are easy to get rotten or broken or articles that are dangerous shall not be submitted as sample or model.

Rule 30 The existing technology referred to in Article 22, paragraph three of the Patent Law means any technology which has been publicly disclosed in publications in the country or abroad, or has been publicly used or made known to the public by any other means in the country, before

the date of filing (or the priority date where priority is claimed), that is, prior art.

Rule 3l The academic or technological meeting referred to in Article 24, subparagraph (2) of the Patent Law means any academic or technological meeting organized by a competent department concerned of the State Council or by a national academic or technological association.

Where any invention-creation for which a patent is applied falls under the provisions of Article 24, subparagraph (l) or (2) of the Patent Law, the applicant shall, when filing the application, make a declaration and, within a time limit of two months from the date of filing, submit certifying documents issued by the entity which organized the international exhibition or academic or technological meeting, stating the fact that the invention-creation was exhibited or published and with the date of its exhibition or publication.

Where any invention-creation for which a patent is applied falls under the provisions of Article 24, subparagraph (3) of the Patent Law, the Patent Administration Department under the State Council may, when it deems necessary, require the applicant to submit the relevant certifying documents within the specified time limit.

Where the applicant fails to make a declaration and submit certifying documents as required in paragraph two of this Rule, or fails to submit certifying documents within the specified time limit as required in paragraph three of this Rule, the provisions of Article 24 of the Patent Law shall not apply to the application.

Rule 32 Where any applicant goes through the formalities of claims priority in accordance with the provisions of Article 30 of the Patent Law, he or it shall, in his or its written declaration, indicate the date and the number of the application which was first filed (hereinafter referred to as the earlier application) and the country in which the application was filed. If the written declaration does not contain the filing date of the earlier application and the name of the country in which the application was filed, the declaration shall be deemed not to have been made.

Where the foreign priority is claimed, the copy of the earlier application documents submitted by the applicant shall be certified by the competent authority of the foreign country in which the application was filed. Where in the certifying material submitted, the name of the earlier applicant is not the same as that of the later one, the applicant shall submit document certifying the assignment of priority. Where the domestic priority is claimed, the copy of the earlier application document shall be prepared by the Patent Administration Department under the State Council .

Rule 33 An applicant may claim one or more priorities for an application for a patent; where multiple priorities are claimed, the priority period for the application shall be calculated from the earliest priority date.

Where an applicant claims the right of domestic priority, if the earlier application is one for a patent for invention, he or it may file an application for a patent for invention or utility model for the same subject matter; if the earlier application is one for a patent for utility model, he or it may

file an application for a patent for utility model or invention for the same subject matter. However, when the later application is filed, if the subject matter of the earlier application falls under any of the following, it may not be taken as the basis for claiming domestic priority:

(1) where the applicant has claimed foreign or domestic priority;

(2) where it has been granted a patent right;

(3) where it is the subject matter of a divisional application filed as prescribed.

Where the domestic priority is claimed, the earlier application shall be deemed to be withdrawn from the date on which the later application is filed.

Rule 34 Where an application for a patent is filed or the right of foreign priority is claimed by an applicant having no habitual residence or business office in China, the Patent Administration Department under the State Council may, when it deems necessary, require the applicant to submit the following documents:

(1) a certificate concerning the nationality of the applicant;

(2) a document certifying the seat of the business office or the headquarters, if the applicant is an enterprise or other organization;

(3) a document certifying that the country, to which the foreigner, foreign enterprise or other foreign organization belongs, recognizes that Chinese entities and individuals are, under the same conditions as those applied to its nationals, entitled to the patent right, the right of priority and other related rights in that country.

Rule 35 Two or more inventions or utility models belonging to a single general inventive concept which may be filed as one application in accordance with the provision of Article 3l, paragraph one of the Patent Law shall be technically inter-related and contain one or more of the same or corresponding special technical features. The expression "special technical features" shall mean those technical features that define a contribution which each of those inventions or utility models, considered as a whole, makes over the prior art.

Rule 36 The expression "the same class" referred to in Article 3l, paragraph two of the Patent Law means that the product incorporating the designs belongs to the same subclass in the classification of products for designs. The expression "be sold or used in sets" means that the products incorporating the designs have the same designing concept and are customarily sold and used at the same time.

Where two or more designs are filed as one application in accordance with the provision of Article

3l, paragraph two of the Patent Law, they shall be numbered consecutively and the numbers shall precede the titles of the view of the product incorporating the design.

Rule 37 When withdrawing an application for a patent, the applicant shall submit to the Patent Administration Department under the State Council a declaration to that effect stating the title of the invention-creation, the filing number and the date of filing.

Where a declaration to withdraw an application for a patent is submitted after the preparations for the publication of the application document has been completed by the Patent Administration Department under the State Council , the application document shall be published as scheduled. However, the declaration withdrawing the application for patent shall be published in the next issue of the Patent Gazette.

Chapter III Examination and Approval of Application for Patent

Rule 38 Where any of the following events occurs, a person who makes examination or hears a case in the procedures of preliminary examination, examination as to substance, reexamination or invalidation shall, on his own initiative or upon the request of the parties concerned or any other interested person, be excluded from excising his function:

(1) where he is a near relative of the party concerned or the agent of the party concerned;

(2) where he has an interest in the application for patent or the patent right;

(3) where he has any other kinds of relations with the party concerned or with the agent of the party concerned that may influence impartial examination and hearing.

(4) where a member of the Patent Reexamination Board who has taken part in the examination of the same application.

Rule 39 Upon the receipt of an application for a patent for invention or utility model consisting of a request, a description (drawings must be included in an application for utility model) and one or more claims, or an application for a patent for design consisting of a request and one or more drawings or photographs showing the design, the Patent Administration Department under the State Council shall accord the date of filing, issue a filing number, and notify the applicant.

Rule 40 In any of the following circumstances, the Patent Administration Department under the State Council shall refuse to accept the application and notify the applicant accordingly:

(1) where the application for a patent for invention or utility model does not contain a request, a description (the description of utility model does not contain drawings) or claims, or the application for a patent for design does not contain a request, drawings or photographs;

(2) where the application is not written in Chinese;

(3) where the application is not in conformity with the provisions of Rule120, paragraph one of these Implementing Regulations;

(4) where the request does not contain the name and address of the applicant;

(5) where the application is obviously not in conformity with the provisions of Article 18, or of Article l9, paragraph one of the Patent Law;

(6) where the kind of protection (patent for invention, utility model or design) of the application for a patent is not clear and definite or cannot be ascertained.

Rule 41 Where the description states that it contains explanatory notes to the drawings but the drawings or part of them are missing, the applicant shall, within the time limit specified by the Patent Administration Department under the State Council , either furnish the drawings or make a declaration for the deletion of the explanatory notes to the drawings. If the drawings are submitted later, the date of their delivery at, or mailing to, the Patent Administration Department under the State Council shall be the date of filing of the application; if the explanatory notes to the drawings are to be deleted, the initial date of filing shall be retained.

Rule 42 Where an application for a patent contains two or more inventions, utility models or designs, the applicant may, before the expiration of the time limit provided for in Rule 54, paragraph one of these Implementing Regulations, submit to the Patent Administration Department under the State Council a divisional application. However, where an application for patent has been rejected, withdrawn or is deemed to have been withdrawn, no divisional application may be filed.

If the Patent Administration Department under the State Council finds that an application for a patent is not in conformity with the provisions of Article 3l of the Patent Law or of Rule 35 or 36 of these Implementing Regulations, it shall invite the applicant to amend the application within a specified time limit; if the applicant fails to make any response after the expiration of the specified time limit, the application shall be deemed to have been withdrawn.

The divisional application may not change the kind of protection of the initial application.

Rule 43 A divisional application filed in accordance with the provisions of Rule 42 of these Implementing Regulations shall be entitled to the filing date and, if priority is claimed, the priority date of the initial application, provided that the divisional application does not go beyond the

scope of disclosure contained in the initial application.

The divisional application shall go through all the formalities in accordance with the provisions of the Patent Law and these Implementing Regulations.

The filing number and the date of filing of the initial application shall be indicated in the request of the divisional application. When the divisional application is filed, it shall be accompanied by a copy of the initial application; if priority is claimed for the initial application, a copy of the priority document of the initial application shall also be submitted.

Rule 44 "Preliminary examination" referred to in Articles 34 and 40 of the Patent Law means the check of an application for a patent to see whether or not it contains the documents as provided for in Articles 26 or 27 of the Patent Law and other necessary documents, and whether or not those documents are in the prescribed form; such check shall also include the following:

(1) whether or not any application for a patent for invention obviously falls under Articles 5 or 25 of the Patent Law, or is not in conformity with the provisions of Article l8 or of Article l9, paragraph one of the Patent Law, or is obviously not in conformity with the provisions of Article 3l, paragraph one, or Article 33 of the Patent Law, or of Rule 2, paragraph one, or Rule 18, or Rule 20 of these Implementing Regulations;

(2) whether or not any application for a patent for utility model obviously falls under Article 5 or 25 of the Patent Law, or is not in conformity with the provisions of Article l8 or of Article l9, paragraph one of the Patent Law, or is obviously not in conformity with the provisions of Article 26, paragraph three or four, or of Article 3l, paragraph one, or of Article 33 of the Patent Law, or of Rule 2, paragraph two, or of Rule l3, paragraph one, or of Rule l8 to 23, or of Rule 43, paragraph one of these Implementing Regulations, or is not entitled to a patent right in accordance with the provisions of Article 9 of the Patent Law;

(3) whether or not any application for a patent for design obviously falls under Article 5 of the Patent Law, or is not in conformity with the provisions of Article l8 or of Article l9, paragraph one of the Patent Law, or is obviously not in conformity with the provisions of Article 3l, paragraph two, or of Article 33 of the Patent Law, or of Rule 2, paragraph three, or of Rule l3, paragraph one, or of Rule 43, paragraph one of these Implementing Regulations, or is not entitled to a patent right in accordance with the provisions of Article 9 of the Patent Law.

The Patent Administration Department under the State Council shall notify the applicant of its opinions after checking his or its application and invite him or it to state his or its observations or to correct his or its application within the specified time limit. If the applicant fails to make any response within the specified time limit, the application shall be deemed to have been withdrawn. Where, after the applicant has made his or its observations or the corrections, the Patent Administration Department under the State Council still finds that the application is not in conformity with the provisions of the Articles and the Rules cited in the preceding subparagraphs, the application shall be rejected.

Rule 45 Apart from the application for patent, any document relating to the patent application which is submitted to the Patent Administration Department under the State Council , shall, in any of the following circumstances, be deemed not to have been submitted:

(1) where the document is not presented in the prescribed form or the indications therein are not in conformity with the prescriptions;

(2) where no certifying document is submitted as prescribed.

The Patent Administration Department under the State Council shall notify the applicant of its opinion after checking that the document is deemed not to have been submitted.

Rule 46 Where the applicant requests an earlier publication of its or his application for a patent for invention, a statement shall be made to the Patent Administration Department under the State Council . The Patent Administration Department under the State Council shall, after preliminary examination of the application, publish it immediately, unless it is to be rejected.

Rule 47 The applicant shall, when indicating in accordance with Article 27 of the Patent Law the product incorporating the design and the class to which that product belongs, refer to the classification of products for designs published by the Patent Administration Department under the State Council . Where no indication, or an incorrect indication, of the class to which the product incorporating the design belongs is made, the Patent Administration Department under the State Council shall supply the indication or correct it.

Rule 48 Any person may, from the date of publication of an application for a patent for invention till the date of announcing the grant of the patent right, submit to the Patent Administration Department under the State Council his observations, with reasons therefor, on the application which is not in conformity with the provisions of the Patent Law.

Rule 49 Where the applicant for a patent for invention cannot furnish, for justified reasons, the documents concerning any search or results of any examination specified in Article 36 of the Patent Law, it or he shall make a statement to the Patent Administration Department under the State Council and submit them when the said documents are available.

Rule 50 The Patent Administration Department under the State Council shall, when proceeding on its own initiative to examine an application for a patent in accordance with the provisions of Article 35, paragraph two of the Patent Law, notify the applicant accordingly.

Rule 5l When a request for examination as to substance is made, and that, within the time limit of three months after the receipt of the notification of the Patent Administration Department under the State Council, the application has entered into examination as to substance, the applicant for a patent for invention may amend the application for a patent for invention on its or his own initiative.

Within two months from the date of filing, the applicant for a patent for utility model or design may amend the application for a patent for utility model or design on its or his own initiative.

Where the applicant amends the application after receiving the notification of opinions of the examination as to substance of the Patent Administration Department under the State Council , he or it shall make the amendment as required by the notification.

The Patent Administration Department under the State Council may, on its own initiative, correct the obvious clerical mistakes and symbol mistakes in the documents of application for a patent. Where the Patent Administration Department under the State Council corrects mistakes on its own initiative, it shall notify the applicant.

Rule 52 When an amendment to the description or the claims in an application for a patent for invention or utility model is made, a replacement sheet in prescribed form shall be submitted, unless the amendment concerns only the alteration, insertion or deletion of a few words. Where an amendment to the drawings or photographs of an application for a patent for design is made, a replacement sheet shall be submitted as prescribed.

Rule 53 In accordance with the provisions of Article 38 of the Patent Law, the circumstances where an application for a patent for invention shall be rejected by the Patent Administration Department under the State Council after examination as to substance are as follows:

(1) where the application does not comply with the provisions of Rule 2, paragraph one of these Implementing Regulations;

(2) where the application falls under the provisions of Article 5 or 25 of the Patent Law, or it does not comply with the provisions of Article 22 of the Patent Law or of Rule l3, paragraph one, or of Rule 20, paragraph one, or of Rule 21, paragraph two of these Implementing Regulations, or the applicant is not entitled to a patent right in accordance with the provisions of Article 9 of the Patent Law;

(3) where the application does not comply with the provisions of Article 26, paragraph three or four, or of Article 3l, paragraph one of the Patent Law;

(4) where the amendment to the application does not comply with the provisions of Article 33 of the Patent Law, or the divisional application does not comply with the provisions of Rule 43, paragraph one of these Implementing Regulations.

Rule 54 After the Patent Administration Department under the State Council issues the notification to grant the patent right, the applicant shall go through the formalities of registration within two months from the date of receipt of the notification. If the applicant completes the formalities of registration within the said time limit, the Patent Administration Department under the State Council shall grant the patent right, issue the patent certificate and announce it.

If the applicant does not go through the formalities of registration within the time limit, he or it shall be deemed to have abandoned its or his right to obtain the patent right.

Rule 55 After the announcement of the decision to grant a patent for utility model, the patentee of the said patent for utility model may request the Patent Administration Department under the State Council to make a search report on the utility model patent.

Where such person requests for a search report on a utility model patent, he shall submit a request, indicating the patent number of the said patent for utility model. Each request shall be limited for one patent for utility model.

After receiving a request for a search report on a utility model patent, the Patent Administration Department under the State Council shall proceed to make an examination of the request. Where the request does not comply with the requirements as prescribed, the said department shall notify the requesting person to amend the request within a specified time limit.

Rule 56 Where, after examination, the request for a search report on a utility model patent complies with the provisions, the Patent Administration Department under the State Council shall promptly make a search report on the utility model patent.

Where the Patent Administration Department under the State Council finds, after search, that the patent for utility model concerned does not comply with the provisions of Article 22 of the Patent Law concerning novelty or inventiveness, it shall cite the documents considered to be relevant, state the reasons therefor and send the copies of the cited relevant documents together with the report.

Rule 57 The Patent Administration Department under the State Council shall correct promptly the mistakes in the patent announcements and documents issued by it once they are discovered, and the corrections shall be announced.

Chapter IV Reexamination of Patent Application and Invalidation of Patent Right

Rule 58 The Patent Reexamination Board shall consist of technical and legal experts appointed by

the Patent Administration Department under the State Council . The person responsible for the Patent Administration Department under the State Council shall be the Director of the Board.

Rule 59 Where the applicant requests the Patent Reexamination Board to make a reexamination in accordance with the provisions of Article 41 of the Patent Law, it or he shall file a request for reexamination, state the reasons and, when necessary, attach the relevant supporting documents.

Where the request for reexamination does not comply with the prescribed form, the person making the request shall rectify it within the time limit fixed by the Patent Reexamination Board. If the requesting person fails to meet the time limit for making rectification, the request for reexamination shall be deemed not to have been filed.

Rule 60 The person making the request may amend its or his application at the time when it or he requests reexamination or makes responses to the notification of reexamination of the Patent Reexamination Board. However, the amendments shall be limited only to remove the defects pointed out in the decision of rejection of the application, or in the notification of reexamination.

The amendments to the application for patent shall be in two copies.

Rule 61 The Patent Reexamination Board shall remit the request for reexamination which the Board has received to the examination department of the Patent Administration Department under the State Council which has made the examination of the application concerned to make an examination. Where that examination department agrees to revoke its former decision upon the request of the person requesting reexamination, the Patent Reexamination Board shall make a decision accordingly and notify the requesting person.

Rule 62 Where, after reexamination, the Patent Reexamination Board finds that the request does not comply with the provisions of the Patent Law and these Implementing Regulations, it shall invite the person requesting reexamination to submit his observations within a specified time limit. If the time limit for making response is not met, the request for reexamination shall be deemed to have been withdrawn. Where, after the requesting person has made its observations and amendments, the Patent Reexamination Board still finds that the request does not comply with the provisions of the Patent Law and these Implementing Regulations, it shall make a decision of reexamination to maintain the earlier decision rejecting the application.

Where, after reexamination, the Patent Reexamination Board finds that the decision rejecting the application does not comply with the provisions of the Patent Law and these Implementing Regulations, or that the amended application has removed the defects as pointed out by the decision rejecting the application, it shall make a decision to revoke the decision rejecting the application, and ask the examination department which has made the examination to continue the examination procedure.

Rule 63 At any time before the Patent Reexamination Board makes its decision on the request for reexamination, the requesting person may withdraw his request for reexamination.

Where the requesting person withdraws his request for reexamination before the Patent Reexamination Board makes its decision, the procedure of reexamination is terminated.

Rule 64 Anyone requesting invalidation or part invalidation of a patent right in accordance with the provisions of Article 45 of the Patent Law shall submit a request and the necessary evidence in two copies. The request for invalidation shall state in detail the grounds for filing the request, making reference to all the evidence as submitted, and indicate the piece of evidence on which each ground is based.

The grounds on which the request for invalidation is based, referred to in the preceding paragraph, mean that the invention-creation for which the patent right is granted does not comply with the provisions of Article 22, Article 23, or of Article 26, paragraph three or four, or of Article 33 of the Patent Law, or of Rule 2, or of Rule l3, paragraph one, or of Rule 20, paragraph one, or of Rule 21, paragraph two of these Implementing Regulations; or the invention-creation falls under the provisions of Articles 5 or 25 of the Patent Law; or the applicant is not entitled to be granted the patent right in accordance with the provisions of Article 9 of the Patent Law.

Rule 65 Where the request for invalidation does not comply with the provisions of Rule 64 of these Implementing Regulations, the Patent Reexamination Board shall not accept it.

Where, after a decision on any request for invalidation of the patent right is made, invalidation based on the same facts and evidence is requested once again, the Patent Reexamination Board shall not accept it.

Where a request for invalidation of a patent for design is based on the ground that the patent for design is in conflict with a prior right of another person, but no effective ruling or judgement is submitted to prove such conflict of rights , the Patent Reexamination Board shall not accept it.

Where the request for invalidation of the patent right does not comply with the prescribed form, the person making the request shall rectify it within the time limit specified by the Patent Reexamination Board. If the rectification fails to be made within the time limit, the request for invalidation shall be deemed not to have been made.

Rule 66 After a request for invalidation is accepted by the Patent Reexamination Board, the person making the request may add reasons or supplement evidence within one month from the date when the request for invalidation is filed. Additional reasons or evidence which are submitted after the specified time limit may be disregarded by the Patent Reexamination Board.

Rule 67 The Patent Reexamination Board shall send a copy of the request for invalidation of the patent right and copies of the relevant documents to the patentee and invite it or him to present its or his observations within a specified time limit.

关于2017年最新专利法实施细则

关于2017年最新专利法实施细则中华人民共和国专利法实施细则大中小 第一章总则 第一条根据《中华人民共和国专利法》，制定本细则。 第二条专利法和本细则规定的各种手续，应当以书面形式或者国务院专利行政部门规定的其他形式办理。 第三条依照专利法和本细则规定提交的各种文件应当使用中文;国家有统一规定的科技术语的，应当采用规范词;外国人名、地名和科技术语没有统一中文译文的，应当注明原文。 依照专利法和本细则规定提交的各种证件和证明文件是外文的，国务院专利行政部门认为必要时，可以要求当事人在指定期限内附送中文译文;期满未附送的，视为未提交该证件和证明文件。 第四条向国务院专利行政部门邮寄的各种文件，以寄出的邮戳日为递交日;邮戳日不清晰的，除当事人能够提出证明外，以国务院专利行政部门收到日为递交日。 国务院专利行政部门的各种文件，可以通过邮寄、直接送交或者其他方式送达当事人。当事人委托专利代理机构的，文件送交专利代理机构;未委托专利代理机构的，文件送交请求书中指明的联系人。 国务院专利行政部门邮寄的各种文件，自文件发出之日起满15日，推定为当事人收到文件之日。 根据国务院专利行政部门规定应当直接送交的文件，以交付日为送达日。 文件送交地址不清，无法邮寄的，可以通过公告的方式送达当事人。自公告之日起满1个月，该文件视为已经送达。

第五条专利法和本细则规定的各种期限的第一日不计算在期限内。期限以年或者月计算的，以其最后一月的相应日为期限届满日;该月无相应日的，以该月最后一日为期限届满日;期限届满日是法定休假日的，以休假日后的第一个工作日为期限届满日。 第六条当事人因不可抗拒的事由而延误专利法或者本细则规定的期限或者国务院专利行政部门指定的期限，导致其权利丧失的，自障碍消除之日起2个月内，最迟自期限届满之日起2年内，可以向国务院专利行政部门请求恢复权利。 除前款规定的情形外，当事人因其他正当理由延误专利法或者本细则规定的期限或者国务院专利行政部门指定的期限，导致其权利丧失的，可以自收到国务院专利行政部门的通知之日起2个月内向国务院专利行政部门请求恢复权利。 当事人依照本条第一款或者第二款的规定请求恢复权利的，应当提交恢复权利请求书，说明理由，必要时附具有关证明文件，并办理权利丧失前应当办理的相应手续;依照本条第二款的规定请求恢复权利的，还应当缴纳恢复权利请求费。 当事人请求延长国务院专利行政部门指定的期限的，应当在期限届满前，向国务院专利行政部门说明理由并办理有关手续。 本条第一款和第二款的规定不适用专利法第二十四条、第二十九条、第四十二条、第六十八条规定的期限。 第七条专利申请涉及国防利益需要保密的，由国防专利机构受理并进行审查;国务院专利行政部门受理的专利申请涉及国防利益需要保密的，应当及时移交国防专利机构进行审查。经国防专利机构审查没有发现驳回理由的，由国务院专利行政部门作出授予国防专利权的决定。 国务院专利行政部门认为其受理的发明或者实用新型专利申请涉及国防利益以外的国家安全或者重大利益需要保密的，应当及时作出按照保密专利申请处理的决

专利法实施细则(全文)

第一章总则 第一条根据《中华人民共和国专利法》(以下简称专利法)，制定本细则。 第二条专利法和本细则规定的各种手续，应当以书面形式或者国务院专利行政部门规定的其他形式办理。 第三条依照专利法和本细则规定提交的各种文件应当使用中文；国家有统一规定的科技术语的，应当采用规范词；外国人名、地名和科技术语没有统一中文译文的，应当注明原文。 依照专利法和本细则规定提交的各种证件和证明文件是外文的，国务院专利行政部门认为必要时，可以要求当事人在指定期限内附送中文译文；期满未附送的，视为未提交该证件和证明文件。 第四条向国务院专利行政部门邮寄的各种文件，以寄出的邮戳日为递交日；邮戳日不清晰的，除当事人能够提出证明外，以国务院专利行政部门收到日为递交日。 国务院专利行政部门的各种文件，可以通过邮寄、直接送交或者其他方式送达当事人。当事人委托专利代理机构的，文件送交专利代理机构；未委托专利代理机构的，文件送交请求书中指明的联系人。 国务院专利行政部门邮寄的各种文件，自文件发出之日起满15日，推定为当事人收到文件之日。 根据国务院专利行政部门规定应当直接送交的文件，以交付日为送达日。 文件送交地址不清，无法邮寄的，可以通过公告的方式送达当事人。自公告之日起满1个月，该文件视为已经送达。 第五条专利法和本细则规定的各种期限的第一日不计算在期限内。期限以年或者月计算的，以其最后一月的相应日为期限届满日；该月无相应日的，以该月最后一日为期限届满日；期限届满日是法定休假日的，以休假日后的第一个工作日为期限届满日。

第六条当事人因不可抗拒的事由而延误专利法或者本细则规定的期限或者国务院专利行政部门指定的期限，导致其权利丧失的，自障碍消除之日起2个月内，最迟自期限届满之日起2年内，可以向国务院专利行政部门请求恢复权利。 除前款规定的情形外，当事人因其他正当理由延误专利法或者本细则规定的期限或者国务院专利行政部门指定的期限，导致其权利丧失的，可以自收到国务院专利行政部门的通知之日起2个月内向国务院专利行政部门请求恢复权利。 当事人依照本条第一款或者第二款的规定请求恢复权利的，应当提交恢复权利请求书，说明理由，必要时附具有关证明文件，并办理权利丧失前应当办理的相应手续；依照本条第二款的规定请求恢复权利的，还应当缴纳恢复权利请求费。 当事人请求延长国务院专利行政部门指定的期限的，应当在期限届满前，向国务院专利行政部门说明理由并办理有关手续。 本条第一款和第二款的规定不适用专利法第二十四条、第二十九条、第四十二条、第六十八条规定的期限。 第七条专利申请涉及国防利益需要保密的，由国防专利机构受理并进行审查；国务院专利行政部门受理的专利申请涉及国防利益需要保密的，应当及时移交国防专利机构进行审查。经国防专利机构审查没有发现驳回理由的，由国务院专利行政部门作出授予国防专利权的决定。 国务院专利行政部门认为其受理的发明或者实用新型专利申请涉及国防利益以外的国家安全或者重大利益需要保密的，应当及时作出按照保密专利申请处理的决定，并通知申请人。保密专利申请的审查、复审以及保密专利权无效宣告的特殊程序，由国务院专利行政部门规定。 第八条专利法第二十条所称在中国完成的发明或者实用新型，是指技术方案的实质性内容在中国境内完成的发明或者实用新型。 任何单位或者个人将在中国完成的发明或者实用新型向外国申请专利的，应当按照下列方式之一请求国务院专利行政部门进行保密审查： (一)直接向外国申请专利或者向有关国外机构提交专利国际申请的，应当事先向国务院专利行政部门提出请求，并详细说明其技术方案；

专利审查指南(word版,有红色标注)

第一部分初步审查 第一章发明专利申请的初步审查 1.引言 根据中华人民共和国专利法(以下简称专利法) 第三十四条的规定，专利局收到发明专利申请后，经初步审查认为符合专利法要求的，自申请日起满十八个月，即行公布。专利局也可以根据申请人的请求早日公布其申请。因此，发明专利申请的初步审查是受理发明专利申请之后、公布该申请之前的一个必要程序。 发明专利申请初步审查的主要任务是： (1)审查申请人提交的申请文件是否符合专利法及其实施细则的规定，发现存在可以补正的缺陷时，通知申请人以补正的方式消除缺陷，使其符合公布的条件；发现存在不可克服的缺陷时，发出审查意见通知书，指明缺陷的性质，并通过驳回的方式结束审查程序。 (2)审查申请人在提出专利申请的同时或者随后提交的与专利申请有关的其他文件是否符合专利法及其实施细则的规定，发现文件存在缺陷时，根据缺陷的性质，通知申请人以补正的方式消除缺陷，或者直接作出文件视为未提交的决定。 (3)审查申请人提交的与专利申请有关的其他文件是否是在专利法及其实施细则规定的期限内或者专利局指定的期限内提交；期满未提交或者逾期提交的，根据情况作出申请视为撤回或者文件视为未提交的决定。 (4)审查申请人缴纳的有关费用的金额和期限是否符合专利法及其实施细则的规定，费用未缴纳或者未缴足或者逾期缴纳的，根据情况作出申请视为撤回或者请求视为未提出的决定。 发明专利申请初步审查的范围是： (1)申请文件的形式审查，包括专利申请是否包含专利法第二十六条规定的申请文件，以及这些文件格式上是否明显不符合专利法实施细则第十六条至第十九条、第二十三条的规定，是否符合专利法实施细则第二条、第三条、第二十六条第二款、第一百一十九条、第一百二十一条的规定。

新修改专利法实施细则说明(标准版)

新修改专利法实施细则说明(标准版) Explanation of the implementation rules of the newly revised P atent Law (Standard Version)

新修改专利法实施细则说明(标准版) 前言：合同是民事主体之间设立、变更、终止民事法律关系的协议。依法成立的合同，受法律保护。本文档根据合同内容要求和特点展开说明，具有实践指导意义， 便于学习和使用，本文档下载后内容可按需编辑修改及打印。 一、与专利法的修改相一致的修改 1．删除关于撤销程序的规定修改后的专利法取消了撤销 程序，新细则也作了相应修改，删除了撤销程序的相关规定（删除了现行细则第55条、56条、57条，修改了现行细则中有关申请、审查、复审和无效中的相关条款）。 2．提高职务发明创造的发明人或者设计人的奖金数额和 报酬比例新细则根据修改后的专利法的精神，参照《科技进步法》、《关于促进科技成果转化若干规定》等法律、法规和相关政策的规定，提高了对职务发明创造的发明人或者设计人给予奖金的数额和报酬的比例（参见新细则第六毡ǜ媛细则规定："中国单位或者个人向外国人转让专利申请权或者专利权的， 由国务院对外经济贸易主管部门会同国务院科学技术行政部门批准"（新细则第1４条） 2．进一步明确了缴费的有关规定

根据现行细则的规定，发明专利申请维持费应当每年缴纳一次，即使最后没有授权，也同样要缴纳。新细则改变了这一缴纳方式，规定在办理授权手续时一并缴纳维持费。也就是说，如果没有授权，则不需要缴纳维持费。新细则进一步明确了有关缴费的其他问题（参见新细则第九章"费用"）。 3．解决与其他相关程序的衔接问题 在民事诉讼实践中，一些法院裁定对专利权采取保全措施或者判决专利权转归他人，需要我局协助执行。但现行细则没有规定我局如何协助执行。新细则增加了相关规定，规都唇尤胧澜缑骋鬃橹刮夜ɡ贫扔胧澜缑骋鬃橹摹队朊骋子泄氐闹恫ㄐ椤罚ㄒ韵录虺浦恫ㄐ椋┑墓娑ň】赡芤恢隆ｎ夜ɡ捌湎冈虻挠泄毓娑ㄓφ笨悸怯胛夜巡渭拥墓侍踉贾械墓娑ㄖ鸩揭恢拢男形夜墓室逦瘢奖闵昵肴恕⒆ɡㄈ撕陀泄氐笔氯恕ｎ耍篻t; （１）关于说明书、权利要求书和摘要的撰写参考"专利合作条约"（pct）作了修改（参见新细则第１８条、24条、25条）。 （２）根据"专利合作条约"的规定，涉及双方当事人程序的时间期限不得延长，这是为了防止一方当事人利用延期作

最新整理专利法知识100条.docx

最新整理专利法知识100条 专利法知识100条 1、表演艺术家的表演以及与录音制品和广播(包括电视)有关的权利通常称为邻接权。 2、表演艺术家的表演以及与录音制品和广播(包括电视)有关的权利属于知识产权中的工业产权部分 3、工业财产、工业产权指人们在经济活动中，为了与同业展开竞争面作出的一些智力成果。 4、专利一般就是指发明专利。 5、知识产权的最大特点是无形的。 6、我们今天所了解的专利制度，一般认为起源于西欧的一些国家。 7、发明专利作为一种正规的制度，最先采用的国家是威尼斯。 8、正式的、全面的专利法直到18世纪末年才出现。 9、智力创造成果的特点是经济智力体力。 10、第一个将西方专利制度思想介绍到我国来的是太平天国天王洪秀全的堂弟洪仁歼。 11、光绪帝批准赐予xxxx机器织布局10年专利。 12、我国近代史上第—个有关专利的法规是xxxx8年清朝光绪帝颁发的“振兴工艺给奖章程”。 13、我国历史上第——部正式的专利法是1944年由当时的国民党政府颁布的。 14、我国是社会主义国家，但没有采用当时存在的绝大多数社会主义国家所采用的发明人证书和专利证书的双轨制。 15、在专利权归属问题上把所有权和管理权分开.

16、下列关于技术的描述：技术是由知识组成的。知识必须利用自然规律。技术必须是系统的知识。 17、发明的专利保护：并非所有发明都可以获得专利保护。 18、各国专利所授予的保护期限过去多在15年至20年之间，现在根据知识产权协定规定为20年。 19、传送技术秘密的方式可以是有形的也可以是无形的。 20、产品发明是指以有形形式出现的一切发明，例如机器、仪器、设备、装置、用具和各种物质等。 21、实用新型只适用于产品，不适用于方法。而且所谓产品，必须是具有一定形状、构造的产品。 22、工业品的外观设计并不增添产品的实用性，它主要是为了使产品对消费者产生吸引力。 23、不授予专利保护的客体动物和植物品种。 24、专利法的核心问题是专利权。 25、就发明创造获得专利的权利是一种财产权。 26、单位指大学本身，而不是指大学内部设立的院、系等小单位。 27、职务发明创造是指由于工作人员执行研究、设计、开发的职务而产生的发明创造。在西方国家称为“雇员发明”。 28、在我国境内有经常居所或者营业所的外国人，在专利方面，享有与我国国民同样的待遇。不需要有条约或者互惠原则的根据。 29、我国专利法采用先申请原则。 30、专利法实施细则采用由他们自行协商确定的 31、专利法采用第三种即混合新颖性的标准。

《新专利法祥解》(全)09年改法前解读

第一章总则 引言 1984年制定的专利法共分八章69条。分别为总则，授予专利权的条件，专利的申请，专利申请的审查和批准，专利权的期限、终止和无效，专利实施的强制许可，专利权的保护和附则。 专利法的第一次修改对19条条文进行了修改，专利法的第二次修改对36条条文进行了修改，但是两次修改对专利法的篇章结构和主要条款序号均未作变动。 总则，顾名思义是一部法律中提纲挈领的部分。我国专利法的总则部分在整个专利法中更占有突出的地位。首先，总则部分包括21条，约占整个专利法所有条款数的三分之一；其次，总则部分涵盖了立法宗旨、主管专利工作的部门、专利申请的客体、申请专利的主体、职务发明与非职务发明的界定、专利权人享有的权利、发明人和设计人的权利、专利代理和专利工作人员的保密责任等重要内容。在专利法的第二次修改中，总则部分的条款数目虽未增加，但内容上有许多重要的修改和补充。主要包括： (1)明确专利法的立法宗旨包括促进科技进步与创新； (2)肯定了两条途径、并行运作的保护制度，明确了省、自治区、直辖市人民政府应设立管理专利工作的部门，以负责本行政区域内的专利管理工作； (3)取消了全民所有制单位对专利权持有的规定，为我国的国有企业创造更好的市场竞争条件； (4)放宽了对职务发明的界定，向发明人倾斜，以更好地鼓励发明创造； (5)与TRIPS协议接轨，强化专利权人的权利，规定专利权人的权利包括禁止许诺销售行为； (6)对中国作为《专利合作条约》（下称PCT条约）成员应当履行的义务和享受的权益做了原则规定；

(7)为保护发明人合法权益，明确了专利代理的职业道德； (8)对国家知识产权局及其专利复审委员会的工作提出了更高的要求，即应当客观、公正、准确、及时地处理有关专利的申请和请求。 第一条 为了保护发明创造专利权，鼓励发明创造，有利于发明创造的推广应用，促进科学技术的进步和创新，适应社会主义现代化建设的需要，特制定本法。 本条规定专利法的立法宗旨。我国专利立法以实现以下五个目标为宗旨： 一、保护发明创造专利权 “保护发明创造专利权”是专利法的核心。专利法第一条开宗明义点明了我国用单一的授予专利权的形式保护发明创造。 什么是专利？人们曾经试图用各种方式准确予以定义，其中为人们较为普遍接受的一种说法是：“专利是由政府机关或者代表若干国家的地区性机构根据申请所颁发的一种文件，这种文件记载了发明创造的内容，并且在一定的时间期间内产生这样的一种法律状况，即获得专利的发明在一般情况下只有经专利权人的许可才能予以实施。” 专利权是知识产权的主要组成部分之一，而知识产权是一种关于无形财产的财产权，其保护对象是“人的心智、人的智力创造”。这是将其称为“知识产权”的原因。 正如任何财产权的内容、范围以及财产所有人的权利、义务要受到某些限制一样，专利权也不是一种绝对的权利。例如当一项在后专利是对他人的在前专利的某种改进时，在后专利的专利权人未经在前专利的专利权人同意，就不能实施自己的发明创造，否则就构成侵犯在先专利的行为。当发明创造涉及国家和公众的重大利益时，国家可以对该专利予以推广应用或者批准强制许可。 在我国历史上，专利制度的孕育是同中国封建社会的解体、商品市场的逐渐形成联系在一起的。19世纪中叶，外国资本主义的入侵促进了中国社会的演变，自给自足的自然经济基础受到破坏，为发展资本主义生产提供了某些客观的条件和可能。一些接受了西方资产阶级民主思想的知识分子开始将专利制度的思想引入中国。1898年（光绪24年），光绪皇帝接受维新派建议，决心变法，在“百

专利法实施细则(全文)

第一章总则 第一条根据《中华人民国专利法》(以下简称专利法)，制定本细则。 第二条专利法和本细则规定的各种手续，应当以书面形式或者国务院专利行政部门规定的其他形式办理。 第三条依照专利法和本细则规定提交的各种文件应当使用中文；有统一规定的科技术语的，应当采用规词；外国人名、地名和科技术语没有统一中文译文的，应当注明原文。 依照专利法和本细则规定提交的各种证件和证明文件是外文的，国务院专利行政部门认为必要时，可以要求当事人在指定期限附送中文译文；期满未附送的，视为未提交该证件和证明文件。 第四条向国务院专利行政部门邮寄的各种文件，以寄出的邮戳日为递交日；邮戳日不清晰的，除当事人能够提出证明外，以国务院专利行政部门收到日为递交日。 国务院专利行政部门的各种文件，可以通过邮寄、直接送交或者其他式送达当事人。当事人委托专利代理机构的，文件送交专利代理机构；未委托专利代理机构的，文件送交请求书中指明的联系人。

国务院专利行政部门邮寄的各种文件，自文件发出之日起满15日，推定为当事人收到文件之日。 根据国务院专利行政部门规定应当直接送交的文件，以交付日为送达日。 文件送交地址不清，无法邮寄的，可以通过公告的式送达当事人。自公告之日起满1个月，该文件视为已经送达。 第五条专利法和本细则规定的各种期限的第一日不计算在期限。期限以年或者月计算的，以其最后一月的相应日为期限届满日；该月无相应日的，以该月最后一日为期限届满日；期限届满日是法定休假日的，以休假日后的第一个工作日为期限届满日。 第六条当事人因不可抗拒的事由而延误专利法或者本细则规定的期限或者国务院专利行政部门指定的期限，导致其权利丧失的，自障碍消除之日起2个月，最迟自期限届满之日起2年，可以向国务院专利行政部门请求恢复权利。 除前款规定的情形外，当事人因其他正当理由延误专利法或者本细则规定的期限或者国务院专利行政部门指定的期限，导致其权利丧失的，可以自收到国务院专利行政部门的通知之日起2个月向国务院专利行政部门请求恢复权利。 当事人依照本条第一款或者第二款的规定请求恢复权利的，应当提交恢复权利请求书，说明理由，必要时附具有关证明文件，并办理权利丧失前应当办理的相应手续；依照本条第二款的规定请求恢复权利的，还应当缴纳恢复权利请求费。

专利法解读

解读2009年新专利法 2008年12月27日在中华人民共和国第十一届全国人民代表大会常务委员会第六次会议上通过了《全国人民代表大会常务委员会关于修改《中华人民共和国专利法>的决定》。自2009年10月1日起施行。 一、对遗传资源利用的特别规定 新专利法对于与遗传资源有关的发明创造作了的规定，在专利法第五条中规定，对违反法律、行政法规的规定获取或者利用遗传资源，并依赖该遗传资源完成的发明创造，不授予专利权。因此在申请专利时，当发明创造与遗传资源有时，专利申请人应当证明有关遗传资源的合法性。对此，新专利法第二十六条中增加了一款规定，依赖遗传资源完成的发明创造，申请人应当在专利申请文件中说明该遗传资源的直接来源和原始来源；申请人无法说明原始来源的，应当陈述理由。 二、对同一发明的两次申请的规定 同一发明专利只能得到一项发明专利权，但现实中有些专利申请人因无法确定自己的发明创造是发明还是实用新型，往往两者同时申请。对于这种情况新专利法在第九条中特别增加了一款，规定认为同样的发明创造只能授予一项专利权。但是，同一申请人同日对同样的发明创造既申请实用新型专利又申请发明专利，先获得的实用新型专利权尚未终止，且申请人声明放弃该实用新型专利权的，可以授予发明专利权。 三、增加许诺销售为专利权行使的范围 在新专利法第十一、六十九条中，规定（1）外观设计专利权被授予后，任何单位或者个人未经专利权人许可，都不得实施其专利，即不得为生产经营目的制造、许诺销售、销售、进口其外观设计专利产品。（2）专利产品或者依照专利方法直接获得的产品，由专利权人或者经其许可的单位、个人售出后，使用、许诺销售、销售、进口该产品的不视为侵犯专利权。从第十一条来看，新专利法加大了对外观设计的保护，使外观设计专利权的保护范围和发明、实用新型一样，都包含了许诺销售。从第六十九条来看，新专利法扩大了购买了专利产品或者依照专利方法直接获得的产品的所有权人对该产品的使用范围，使所有权人可以许诺销售和进口自己购买的产品。 四、专利许可合同的订立形式 新专利法第十二条规定，任何单位或者个人实施他人专利的，应当与专利权人订立实施许可合同，向专利权人支付专利使用费。被许可人无权允许合同规定以外的任何单位或者个人实

《中国专利法详解》代理人备考版解读

《中华人民共和国专利法》读书笔记 第一章总则 第一条立法宗旨 为了保护专利权人的合法权益，鼓励发明创造，推动发明创造的应用，提高创新能力，促进科学技术进步和经济社会发展，制定本法。 释： 1、保护专利权人的合法利益 2、鼓励发明创造 3、推动发明创造的应用 4、提高创新能力，促进科学技术进步和经济社会发展 第二条发明创造的定义 本法所称的发明创造是指发明、实用新型和外观设计。 发明，是指对产品、方法或者其改进所提出的新的技术方案。 实用新型，是指对产品的形状、构造或者其结合所提出的适于实用的新的技术方案。 外观设计，是指对产品的形状、图案或者其结合以及色彩与形状、图案的结合所作出的富有美感并适于工业应用的新设计。 一、发明 释： 1、《专利审查指南》对“技术方案”作了如下解释： 技术方案：是对要解决的技术问题所采取的利用了自然

规律的技术手段的集合。技术手段通常是由技术特征来体现的。 未采用技术手段解决技术问题，以获得符合自然规律的技术效果的方案，不属于专利法第二条第二款规定的客体。 气味或者诸如声、光、电、磁、波等信号或者能量也不属于专利法第二条第二款的规定的客体。但是利用其性质解决技术问题的，则不属于此列。 2、《专利审查指南2010》第二部分专门加入了“关于涉及计算机程序的发明专利申请审查的若干规定”，其中规定： 如果涉及计算机程序的发明专利申请的解决方案执行计算机程序的目的是解决技术问题，在计算机上运行计算机程序从而对外部或内部对象进行控制或处理所反映的是遵循自然规律的技术手段，并且由此获得的符合自然规律的技术效果，则这种解决方案属于专利法第二条第二款所说的技术方案，属于专利保护的客体。 如果涉及计算机程序的发明专利申请的解决方案执行计算机程序的目的不是解决技术问题，或者在计算机上运行计算机程序从而对外部或内部对象进行控制或处理所反映的不是利用自然规律的技术手段，或者获得的不是受自然规律约束的效果，则这种解决技术方案不属于专利法第二条第二款所说的技术方案，不属于专利保护的客体。 3、所谓“积极效果”或者“有益效果”，是指通过发明创造的实施能够给公众或者社会带来益处，使发明创造具有予以实施应用的价值。多、快、好、省、方便、便宜等都能构成“积极”和“有益”效果。 4、技术特征 技术方案由技术特征组成。产品的技术方案的技术特征可以是零件、部件、材料、器具、设备、装置的形状、结构、

专利可以同时申请发明和实用新型专利吗

可以同时申请发明和实用新型专利吗对于一项发明创造是否可以同时获得两项专利授权及是否可以同时申请发明专利和实用新型专利专利的问题，我们来做详细解读。先来看看发明专利与实用新型专利的区别。 发明专利和实用新型专利的区别 发明专利和实用新型专利的根本区别在于发明专利的发明是指对产品、方法或其改进提出的新的技术方案，而实用新型专利是指对产品的形状、构造或者其结合所提出的适于实用的新的技术方案。 发明专利 发明专利申请是针对产品、方法或者产品、方法的改进所提出的新的技术方案，可以申请发明专利。发明专利是专利法保护的专利的三种类型之一,而且法律状态最为稳定技术价值最高。 发明是一项新的技术方案，技术方案是指运用自然规律解决人类生产、生活中某一特定技术问题的具体构思，是利用自然规律、自然力使之产生一定效果的方案。技术方案一般由若干技术特征组成。例如产品技术方案的技术特征可以是零件、部件、材料、器具、设备、

装置的形状、结构、成分、尺寸等等;方法技术方案的技术特征可以是工艺、步骤、过程，所涉及的时间、温度、压力以及所采用的设备和工具等等。各个技术特征之间的相互关系也是技术特征。 发明可以分为产品发明和方法发明。 产品发明包括所有由人创造出来的物品做出的发明，是一项以物质形式出现的发明，如机器、仪表、新材料、新物质等。 方法发明包括所有利用自然规律的方法，又可以分为制造方法和操作使用方法两种类型，是一项以程序的过程形式出现的发明，如产品的制造加工工艺、产品的使用方法、化学方法、生物方法等。 专利法保护的发明也可以是对现有产品或方法的改进。绝大多数发明都是对现有技术的改进，例如对某些技术特征进行新的组合，对某些技术特征进行新的选择等，只要这些组合或选择产生了新的技术效果，就是可以获得专利保护的发明。 实用新型专利 实用新型专利申请是针对产品的形状、构造或者其结合所提出的适于实用的新的技术方案，可以申请实用新型专利。专利法中对实用新型的创造性和技术水平要求较发明专利低，但实用价值大，在这个意义上，实用新型有时会被人们又称小发明或小专利。

专利法实施细则解读

《专利法实施细则》修正案逐条解说 主讲人：何越峰来源：博派专利论坛白无 以下是由白无整理笔记，加入自己一些心得，相关的研究结论汇总而成 一、期限的计算原R6中修改了一处“期限届满日是法定节假日的，以节假日后的第一个工作日为期限届满日”修改成了“期限届满日是法定休假日的，以节假日后的第一个工作日为期限届满日”这一点，我在之前的专利法实施细则修改对照上没有看到这一处的示意，是不是之前做对照的人都把这一个小小的改动忽略了呢，何博士指出这一点修改近一步放松了对期限的计算标准。不仅法定假日和节日连调休日都可以顺延期限。 关于期限届满，我经常在想这样一个问题，会不会有考试出一个这样的试题：某发明专利申请日是2008年2月21日，优先权日是2007年的11月6日，申请人应该在下列哪个期限之前提出实质审查请求？A、2011年2月21日B、2010年11月6日C、2010年2月21日D、2010年11月8日发现我想到的是一个怎样的bug了吗？按照我们一般做题的思路肯定是选B了，自优先权日起3年内提出，但是2010年的11月6日，就是我们正在考试的周六，那么我们很明显知道11月8日才是应该顺延到的第一个工作日，这种情况下，是不是我们应该从实际出发选择D呢？其实从实务角度来说或者从细则上规定而言都应该去推算应当届满的日期是不是公休日，但是对于假期顺延的规定一般只是在元旦、国庆这样明显假日会考察，别的日期我们不太可能去推算到底是不是休假日，那么这样的一个题，不是明显的假期，但是细心的人都会注意到这个日子我们确实有理由知道是假期。 二、恢复权利要求的条件和要求将第七条改为第六条，增加一款，作为第三款：“当事人依照本条第一款或者第二款的规定请求恢复权利的，应当提交恢复权利请求书，说明理由，必要时附具有关证明文件，并办理权利丧失前应当办理的相应手续；依照本条第二款的规定请求恢复权利的，还应当缴纳恢复权利请求费。”根据何博士的说明，在当初修改法案的意见征集时，公众提出是否可以扩大不可抗力因素到一些生活方面原因，而最后研究的结果还是只把自然灾害和大型灾难作为不可抗力因素，近几年专利局接受过的不可抗力因素是恢复理由是：美国911袭击事件、汶川地震。

2021年关于新修改的专利法实施细则的说明

编号：JY-HT-06913 2021年关于新修改的专利法实施细则的说明 Any parties with a cooperative relationship can sign a contract to protect legal rights 甲方：________________________ 乙方：________________________ 签订日期：_____年____月____日 编订：MZYUNBO设计

2021年关于新修改的专利法实施细则的说 明 （2001年6月26日） 2000年8月25日，第九届全国人大常委会第十七次会议通过了《关于修改〈中华人民共和国专利法〉的决定》。为了配合修改后的专利法的实施，国家知识产权局在总结多年实践经验的基础上，经过认真研究，并征求专利代理机构、专利管理机关、国务院有关部门及有关专家、学者的意见，拟订了《中华人民共和国专利法实施细则修正案（送审稿）》。国务院法制办为审议《中华人民共和国专利法实施细则修正案（送审稿）》，又多次召开了科技部、国家经贸委、外经贸部、最高人民法院等有关部门以及专家、学者参加的征求意见会。国务院法制办综合各有关方面意见送国务院审批的《中华人民共和国专利法实施细则（修正草案）》已于2001年6月15日经国务院批准通过，将于2001年7月1日与修改后的专利法同日施行。我国专

利法实施细则在修订过程遵循了以下原则：一、与专利法的修改相一致；二、简化程序，与加快审查的目标一致，与方便申请人的目标一致；三、与国际趋势相协调，履行我国应尽的国际义务。我国专利法实施细则的颁布是健全完善我国专利制度的又一里程碑。现将主要内容简介如下： 一、与专利法的修改相一致的修改 1．删除关于撤销程序的规定修改后的专利法取消了撤销程序，新细则也作了相应修改，删除了撤销程序的相关规定（删除了现行细则第55条、56条、57条，修改了现行细则中有关申请、审查、复审和无效中的相关条款）。 2．提高职务发明创造的发明人或者设计人的奖金数额和报酬比例新细则根据修改后的专利法的精神，参照《科技进步法》、《关于促进科技成果转化若干规定》等法律、法规和相关政策的规定，提高了对职务发明创造的发明人或者设计人给予奖金的数额和报酬的比例（参见新细则第六毡ǜ媛细则规定："中国单位或者个人向外国人转让专利申请权或者专利权的，由国务院对外经济贸易主管部门会同国务院科学技术行政部门批准"（新细则第1４条）

2020版关于新修改的专利法实施细则的说明

( 合同范本 ) 甲方： 乙方： 日期：年月日 精品合同 / Word文档 / 文字可改 2020版关于新修改的专利法实 施细则的说明 Constrain both parties to perform their responsibilities and obligations together, and clarify the obligations that both parties need to perform within the time limit

2020版关于新修改的专利法实施细则的说 明 （2001年6月26日） 2000年8月25日，第九届全国人大常委会第十七次会议通过了《关于修改〈中华人民共和国专利法〉的决定》。为了配合修改后的专利法的实施，国家知识产权局在总结多年实践经验的基础上，经过认真研究，并征求专利代理机构、专利管理机关、国务院有关部门及有关专家、学者的意见，拟订了《中华人民共和国专利法实施细则修正案（送审稿）》。国务院法制办为审议《中华人民共和国专利法实施细则修正案（送审稿）》，又多次召开了科技部、国家经贸委、外经贸部、最高人民法院等有关部门以及专家、学者参加的征求意见会。国务院法制办综合各有关方面意见送国务院审批的《中华人民共和国专利法实施细则（修正草案）》已于2001年6月15日经国务院批准通过，将于2001年7月1日与

修改后的专利法同日施行。我国专利法实施细则在修订过程遵循了以下原则：一、与专利法的修改相一致；二、简化程序，与加快审查的目标一致，与方便申请人的目标一致；三、与国际趋势相协调，履行我国应尽的国际义务。我国专利法实施细则的颁布是健全完善我国专利制度的又一里程碑。现将主要内容简介如下： 一、与专利法的修改相一致的修改 1．删除关于撤销程序的规定修改后的专利法取消了撤销程序，新细则也作了相应修改，删除了撤销程序的相关规定（删除了现行细则第55条、56条、57条，修改了现行细则中有关申请、审查、复审和无效中的相关条款）。 2．提高职务发明创造的发明人或者设计人的奖金数额和报酬比例新细则根据修改后的专利法的精神，参照《科技进步法》、《关于促进科技成果转化若干规定》等法律、法规和相关政策的规定，提高了对职务发明创造的发明人或者设计人给予奖金的数额和报酬的比例（参见新细则第六毡ǜ媛细则规定："中国单位或者个人向外国人转让专利申请权或者专利权的，由国务院对外经济贸易主管部门会同国务院科学技术行政部门批准"（新细则第1４条）

解读专利法修正案草案

专利法修正案草案提交十三届全国人大常委会第七次会议审议。草案加强对专利权人合法权益的保护，促进专利实施和运用，并将一批实践证明成熟的做法上升为法律规范。 专利侵权法定赔偿额拟提高为10万元至500万元，网络服务提供者将对网络专利侵权承担连带责任，单位对职务发明创造专利权可以依法处置，新设专利开放许可制度，完善专利授权制度……此次专利法修改落实党中央、国务院关于知识产权工作的重要部署，基于我国自身发展需要，从现实国情出发，重点解决我国专利领域存在的突出问题。 国家知识产权局局长申长雨在作草案审议的说明时表示，加强知识产权保护、提高自主创新能力，已经成为加快转变经济发展方式、实施创新驱动发展战略的内在需要。我国现行专利法于1985年施行，进行过三次修正，对鼓励和保护发明创造、促进科技进步和创新发挥了重要作用。随着形势发展，专利领域出现了一些新情况、新问题。为了进一步贯彻落实党中央、国务院部署要求，解决实践中存在的问题，有必要修改现行专利法。 加大对侵犯专利权的赔偿力度，显著提高违法成本，充分显示法律威慑作用，草案拟规定：对故意侵犯专利权，情节严重的，可以在按照权利人受到的损失、侵权人获得的利益或者专利许可使用费倍数计算的数额一到五倍内确定赔偿数额;并将在难以计算赔偿数额的情况下法院可以酌情确定的赔偿额，从现行专利法规定的1万元到100万元提高为10万元到500万元。 为解决专利维权举证难题，完善举证责任，草案拟增加规定：人民法院为确定赔偿数额，在权利人已经尽力举证，而与侵权行为相关的账簿、资料主要由侵权人掌握的情况下，可以

责令侵权人提供与侵权行为相关的账簿、资料，侵权人不提供或者提供虚假的账簿、资料的，人民法院可以参考权利人的主张和提供的证据判定赔偿数额。 在完善专利行政执法方面，草案拟增加规定：国务院专利行政部门可以应专利权人或者利害关系人的请求处理在全国有重大影响的专利侵权纠纷;管理专利工作的部门应专利权人或者利害关系人的请求处理专利侵权纠纷，对在本行政区域内侵犯其同一专利权的案件可以合并处理;对跨区域侵犯其同一专利权的案件可以请求上级人民政府管理专利工作的部门处理。 为应对不断增多的网络专利侵权现象，明确网络服务提供者对网络专利侵权的连带责任，草案拟进一步规定：专利权人或者利害关系人可以依据人民法院生效的判决书、裁定书、调解书，或者管理专利工作的部门作出的责令停止侵权的决定，通知网络服务提供者采取删除、屏蔽、断开侵权产品链接等必要措施，网络服务提供者未及时采取必要措施的，要承担连带责任。 为促进专利实施和运用，明确单位对职务发明创造的处置权，草案拟增加规定：单位对职务发明创造申请专利的权利和专利权可以依法处置，实行产权激励，采取股权、期权、分红等方式，使发明人或者设计人合理分享创新收益，促进相关发明创造的实施和运用。 在加强专利转化服务方面，草案拟规定：国务院专利行政部门应当加强专利信息公共服务体系建设，提供专利信息基础数据，促进专利信息传播与利用;国务院专利行政部门、地方人民政府管理专利工作的部门应当会同同级相关部门采取措施，加强专利公共服务，促进专利实施和运用。

无效的理由专利法实施细则65条

无效的理由专利法实施细则65条

无效期间专利文件修改的有关规定: 审查指南相关规定 1、发明或实用新型专利文件的修改仅限于权利要求书，其原则是： 1）不得改变原权利要求的主题名称； 2）与授权的权利要求相比，不得扩大原专利的保护范围； 3）不得超出原说明书和权利要求书记载的范围； 4）一般不得增加未包含在授权的权利要求书中的技术特征 2、修改权利要求书的具体方式一般限于权利要求的删除、合并和技术方案的删除。 权利要求的合并是指两项或者两项以上相互无从属关系但在授权公告文本中从属于同一独立权利要求的权利要求的合并。该新的权利要求应当包含被合并的从属权利要求中的全部技术特征。在独立权利要求未作修改的情况下，不允许对其从属权利要求进行合并式修改。 3、在专利复审委员会作出审查决定之前，专利权人可以删除权利要求或者权利要求中包括的技术方案。 仅在下列三种情形的答复期限内，专利权人可以以合并的方式修改权利要求书： （1）针对无效宣告请求书； （2）针对请求人增加的无效宣告理由或者补充的证据； （3）针对专利复审委员会引入的请求人未提及的无效宣告理由或证据。 判断创造性的“三步法： （1）、确定最接近的现有技术 （2）、确定发明的区别技术特征以及该区别技术特征所要解决的技术问题 （3）、判断要求保护的发明对本领域的技术人员来说是否显而易见 显而易见就是判定对比文件是否公开了上述区别技术特征，以及对比文件公开的区别技术特征是起到的作用是否与发明的作用相同，然后再分析领域是否相同，是否显而易见。

新颖性的判断时：一定要体现单独对比原则。 单一性要求合案申请的原则：是否是做出贡献的特定技术特征符合同一发明构思 .

谈谈对知识产权的认识 [对专利的一点认识]

谈谈对知识产权的认识 [对专利的一点认 识] 关于专利的思辨 对于与专利产品相近似的产品来说，判断其是否侵权，目前唯一的理论标准是看其是否落入专利权的保护范围。而是否落入专利权的保护范围，最权威的做法就是：将两个产品的技术特征进行比较，看近似产品的技术特征是否一一落入专利产品的技术特征范围。完全对号入座的，则构成侵权； 如果其中有一项特征不符合，则形成“缺项”，不构成侵权。这也是在目前专利审判工作中常用的判断方法。 勿庸质疑，这种沿袭多年的判断方法有着一定的合理性。但随着市场仿冒产品的不断涌现，正常的市场竞争秩序被打乱，竞争产生无序，专利权人的合法权益成为水中月、镜中花，好看不中用，得不到切实保护。笔者认为，产生这一切问题的根源，一方面在于：人们法治观念的不断增强，所带来的专利侵权风险规避意识的不断提高，以及规避专利侵权风险手段、技能的提高； 而根本原因在于：认定专利侵权理论的简单化、陈旧化，以及由此带来的在实践中判断是否构成专利侵权方法的简单化、平面化。由此给专利权保护留下很大空间，也给不法之徒留下巨大空隙，产生了对专利技术和专利产品保护措施、手段的软弱和滞后。

有一案例很能说明这个问题。 1998年，湖南常德市电气控制设备厂(以下简称常德电控厂)，状告淮阴xx申电器有限公司(以下简称xx公司)专利侵权。 原告常德电控厂诉称：原告于1993年7月19日向中国专利局申请了名为“节能型脉冲继电器”的93234366.x实用新型专利，中国专利局于1994年4月8日正式授予专利权。被告xx公司自l995年8月以来生产了jlmd—iia—t“漏电可调脉冲继电器”(第二代)和jlmd—iid(t)“节能型漏电脉冲(触电)继电器”(第三代)两种侵权产品，并在湖南省内大量销售，侵犯了专利权人的合法权益，使专利权人近几年蒙受权大的经济损失。为维护专利权人合法权益，原告请求法院依法判令被告立即停止侵权产品的生产、销售和宣传及公开更正，消除影响，并赔偿专利权人经济损失人民币371.5万元。 被告xx公司则辩称：根据中国专利局的文件记载，原告的节能型脉冲继电器有四个必要的技术特征。而被告的产品的技术特征与原告上述权利要求书中的必要技术特征相对照有着明显的实质区别，被告产品不具有原告权利要求书中“增设了二极管d09”这一必要技术特征。因此，被告生产的产品显然没有侵犯原告的专利权。请求法院依法维护被告的合法权益，驳回原告的诉讼请求。 此案案情并不复杂，但xx和江苏两级法院的判决却很有意思：xx中级法院认为：判断被告产品侵权与否，应以原告专利权利要求书所记载的该项专利必要技术特征内容为准。原告该项专利的权利保护范围是：一种节能型脉冲继电器，它包括底板（1）、外壳(3)、接

专利法实施细则(2010年)修改解读

专利法实施细则（2010年）修改解读 ---李军 一、关于专利申请文件 1、统一规定三种专利请求书的内容 未修改之前，发明和实用新型请求书的内容相同，外观设计请求书的内容与它们不同，细则修改后（细则第十六条），统一规定三种专利请求书的内容。 2、实用新型说明书增加附图 新细则第十七条增加第五款规定实用新型说明书应当有表示要求保护的产品的形状、构造或者其结合的附图。 3、外观设计申请增加”简要说明”，并在关联设计中指定基本设计 新细则第二十八条外观设计的简要说明应当写明外观设计产品的名称、用途，外观设计的设计要点，并指定一幅最能表明设计要点的图片或者照片。省略视图或者请求保护色彩的，应当在简要说明中写明。对同一产品的多项相似外观设计提出一件外观设计专利申请的，应当在简要说明中指定其中一项作为基本设计。 二、专利申请和审批程序 1、增加同日申请实用新型和发明两种专利的情形 细则第四十一条两个以上的申请人同日（指申请日；有优

先权的，指优先权日）分别就同样的发明创造申请专利的，应当在收到国务院专利行政部门的通知后自行协商确定申请人。 同一申请人在同日（指申请日）对同样的发明创造既申请实用新型专利又申请发明专利的，应当在申请时分别说明对同样的发明创造已申请了另一专利；未作说明的，依照专利法第九条第一款关于同样的发明创造只能授予一项专利权的规定处理。 国务院专利行政部门公告授予实用新型专利权，应当公告申请人已依照本条第二款的规定同时申请了发明专利的说明。 发明专利申请经审查没有发现驳回理由，国务院专利行政部门应当通知申请人在规定期限内声明放弃实用新型专利权。申请人声明放弃的，国务院专利行政部门应当作出授予发明专利权的决定，并在公告授予发明专利权时一并公告申请人放弃实用新型专利权声明。申请人不同意放弃的，国务院专利行政部门应当驳回该发明专利申请；申请人期满未答复的，视为撤回该发明专利申请。 实用新型专利权自公告授予发明专利权之日起终止。 2、增加保密专利申请及审查事项 细则第七条第二款国务院专利行政部门认为其受理的发明或者实用新型专利申请涉及国防利益以外的国家安全或者重大利益需要保密的，应当及时作出按照保密专利申请处理的决定，并通知申请人。保密专利申请的审查、复审以及保密专利