风险社会对传统诉讼模式的挑战及其变革

龙源期刊网 https://www.sodocs.net/doc/5a8156966.html, 风险社会对传统诉讼模式的挑战及其变革

作者：阳建勋

来源：《湖南大学学报(社会科学版)》2011年第02期

［摘要］以严格区分公、私为基础的传统诉讼模式在风险社会面临着不少挑战，如传统的诉讼分类难以涵盖不断涌现的新社会冲突、超个人的集体利益主体的诉讼资格问题凸显、个人诉讼成本的增加使其远离司法。为应对挑战，传统诉讼模式应当变革：一是通过集团诉讼或公益诉讼适度地扩大当事人资格；二是完善配套制度，降低受害人诉讼成本，提高其诉讼收益，使其既可能也愿意“接近司法”，而不是选择文明社会之前通行的“私力救济”。

［关键词］风险社会；传统诉讼模式；诉讼机制变革

［中图分类号］D915.1［文献标识码］Ａ［文章编号］1008—1763(2011)02—0146—

(Law School ，Guangzhou University，Guangzhou 510006，China)

Abstract:There are many challenges for traditional litigation mode based on strictly differentiating “public” and “private” in risk society. For example, traditional lawsuit classification cannot cover emerging new conflicts, no suitable party stands to sue for collective interests, and increasingly litigation cost makes them give up suing for their interests. In order to copy with the challenges, following revolutions of traditional litigation mode should be implemented: party qualification should be moderately expanded through class action or public interest litigation, on the other hand, supporting systems should be perfected to reduce the cost litigation of aggrieved party and improve their income, which makes it po ssible and willing to “close to justice”, not to choose

litigation mode; revolutions of litigation mode

一贝克的风险社会理论简述

贝克在1986年《风险社会》中首次提出了“风险社会”概念,“现代性正从古典工业社会的轮廓中脱颖而出，正在形成一种崭新的形式——（工业的）‘风险社会’。”［1］(P2)贝克的风险社会理论以区分传统的现代化与工业社会的现代化为前提，或者表述为古典的现代化与反思性的现代化。贝克认为，19世纪以来古典现代化导致了社会思想本质上的一个神话——“发达的工业社会，连同它的工作和生活方式，它的生产部门，它的立足经济增长的思想范畴，它对科